Post by account_disabled on Jan 11, 2024 8:09:53 GMT
initiative of the National Justice Council? Alexandre de Moraes — I think this should be done by regulation by the courts themselves. This is not the constitutional role of the Council. The Constitution did not end self-government in the courts. She created the CNJ to monitor whether this self-government is complying with the principles of administration. ConJur — Do you think that judges and judges, as well as Supreme Court ministers, should be subject to impeachment ? Alexandre de Moraes — I wouldn’t extend it to the entire judiciary. I think that only the ministers of the higher courts, who were questioned by the Senate, should be subject to impeachment , also by the Senate.
The other judges, I don't think so. ConJur — Why not? Alexandre de Moraes — Because it would politicize the Judiciary too much. The proximity between the state courts and the Legislative Assembly and the proximity between the higher courts and the Senate are absolutely different. The judge Phone Number List arrived at the Court of Justice through a public examination, he did not go through the Assembly. At higher levels, everyone arrived politically. They have their merits, but the investiture is political, so it can have greater political control. But it is not possible to place political control over the judge who reached the bench via competition. ConJur — What do you think of politicization in the higher courts and the.
Supreme Court, where there is a stronger link with party politics than with the judiciary? Alexandre de Moraes — I, personally, am against it. The President of the Republic chooses, in theory, people close to him. It's the rule of the game. In my opinion, it should be different. It could be like in Europe, where each of the three Powers, Judiciary, Legislative and Executive, chooses a third. There should also be a term of 12 years, at most, for renewal and not bind the courts to the government so much. ConJur — Should compulsory retirement at age 75 further worsen the court renewal rate? Alexandre de Moraes — It is logical that, reaching the age of 75, we will initially preserve.
The other judges, I don't think so. ConJur — Why not? Alexandre de Moraes — Because it would politicize the Judiciary too much. The proximity between the state courts and the Legislative Assembly and the proximity between the higher courts and the Senate are absolutely different. The judge Phone Number List arrived at the Court of Justice through a public examination, he did not go through the Assembly. At higher levels, everyone arrived politically. They have their merits, but the investiture is political, so it can have greater political control. But it is not possible to place political control over the judge who reached the bench via competition. ConJur — What do you think of politicization in the higher courts and the.
Supreme Court, where there is a stronger link with party politics than with the judiciary? Alexandre de Moraes — I, personally, am against it. The President of the Republic chooses, in theory, people close to him. It's the rule of the game. In my opinion, it should be different. It could be like in Europe, where each of the three Powers, Judiciary, Legislative and Executive, chooses a third. There should also be a term of 12 years, at most, for renewal and not bind the courts to the government so much. ConJur — Should compulsory retirement at age 75 further worsen the court renewal rate? Alexandre de Moraes — It is logical that, reaching the age of 75, we will initially preserve.